Alcohol and Heroin Are All the Same

A discussion on Mallory, a new documentary by Helena Třeštíková

Mallory (Helena Třeštíková, 2015)

For 13 years, Mallory has been trying to get rid of her label of a druggie. Her life changed after the birth of her son – she spent 16 days in a drug rehab and started a completely new life. However, it turned out to be rather black-and-white with no way out – Mallory found herself on the street and her son was placed in a mental asylum. We invited drug policy experts – sociologist Martin Nekola (MN), national anti-drug coordinator Jindřich Vobořil (JV), and Šárka Slezáková (ŠS), an expert on observational documentary filmmaking to discuss Helena Třeštíková’s Golden Globe-winning film, Mallory.

ŠS: In the context of Helena Třeštíková’s film works and especially her previous two films about drug addicts, Trapped and Katka, Mallory stands out as the only film that shows life without drugs. As a spectator, you can observe what happens when you decide to quit taking drugs.

JV: When watching the film, I couldn’t stop wondering why such a smart woman – Mallory – doesn’t take advantage of all the possibilities that could help her solve her life situation after quitting drugs. Why is she living in a car when there are shelters for mothers and children? In her case, I can’t see why she wouldn’t be admitted to one of such shelters – which, by the way, are mostly of a pretty good standard – especially if she is friends with people from the Sananim sheltered housing.

MN: I was also puzzled by the role of shelters in Mallory’s story. When I try to explain the difference between social help organised by the state and the non-governmental non-profit sector, I usually emphasise flexibility as the key aspect. And although they would love to help, officials have their hands tied. For example, in the film you can clearly see that the only information they are able to give you is that there’s a lottery on the distribution of flats or that the Sedmidomky hostel is only intended for bad payers from houses owned by the municipality and Mallory is not entitled to stay. In this respect, the non-profit sector is much more flexible and able to help in a crisis situation. It is also more easily within the clients’ reach and better understands their situation and their past experience.

JV: The problem is that the film doesn’t provide the full context. Particularly in this case, I was on the side of Mallory when she was dealing with the authorities, but I’ve seen situations when the clerks were right in their decisions. The film simply lacks context and we don’t have enough information to objectively pinpoint the problem.


Two faces of documentary observation

ŠS: This documentary form, indeed, has two edges. The director is obviously limited to some events in the lives of the protagonists. She is not able to witness all of the major twists in their lives. And all she can offer is her own perspective of the selected events. In documentary observation, the individual director’s approach is much more clear-cut than in other types of documentary films. Třeštíková also does not tell us much about the protagonist’s family and relations; we don’t know anything about her mother, or her partners, who are presented to the audience as shadows or stage props.

JV: I don’t consider this a deficiency on the part of the director. It mainly depends on Mallory, what she finds important to reveal. We can only see her view of the situation, not an exhaustive and complex picture of the events in her life.

MN: And it is not even possible to pay attention to all of the related issues. Why should we be able to find out whether it was right that they fired Mallory, or whether she was or wasn’t rude to the customers. But I greatly appreciated the featured answering machine messages that filled up for the scenes that weren’t captured on camera, although some critics say that they were recorded additionally.

ŠS: Helena Třeštíková does have an answering machine, which in the film functions as a mediator that helps develop the relationship between the director and the protagonist, not only filling in the gaps. Třeštíková is one of the few directors, who influences the events in her observational films. This is not obvious at the first sight and it’s hard to figure out. The film in fact could have had a clear influence on Mallory’s life. For instance, the director and her camera in a certain way influenced the clerks, she perhaps even tried to help or give advice.

MN: On the other hand, camera was also present when the protagonist of the film Katka spoke with the office clerks and the conflicts were much more dramatic. Yes, Katka was in a different position than Mallory, she was often intoxicated when talking to the clerks or her doctor. This again proves that Mallory is a very intelligent woman who knows what her goal is and how to achieve this goal.


JV: It was interesting to watch how Mallory’s face was changing. To me as a practitioner it occurred that she could have been going through some sort of a depression. Perhaps if she had received some treatment for or someone had offered help, she wouldn’t have had to live so long on the street. The whole story could have had a completely different ending. Depression could’ve been the main reason why she was unable to take care of her son whom she in a good will placed in a mental asylum, more or less only to make sure he has a place to stay. However, alcohol was ruining her life much more than hard drugs. It actually played a crucial role in the events. She struggled hard to avoid heroin, and took to alcohol that was ruining her health and life and also prevented her from seeing her son. Plus her partners, too, were alcoholics who used to beat her. What is then the difference between heroin and alcohol abuse? It’s all the same.

ŠS: As I see it, it’s actually rather an ethical question whether her son should have been involved in the film at all, if he clearly wasn’t able to give his informed consent. What about his privacy? The film recounts the story of his whole life, reveals details about his childhood, which can definitely affect the approach of his friends and contemporaries. In my opinion, the director is balancing on the edge – does she have the right to show the story of this little kid in a film?

MN: As I see it, Třeštíková is very cautious regarding privacy issues. The only moments where we can see Mallory’s son, are the two meetings with his mother, which definitely have to be included in the film. She is discreet enough not to mention his school problems. She gave many hints, but that was absolutely OK in my terms. I can’t imagine how the film would work without the scenes showing her son.

JV: Actually, what I personally was lacking was the end of the boy’s story.

Challenging the stereotypes

MN: Mallory can effectively challenge the stereotype of a drug addict whose problem is that her or his will is not strong enough. She managed to handle situations in which people easily go back to their addiction. Going through traumas such as a break-up, loss of job or homelessness, they often fail to resist and take drugs to run away from their problems. This film may be eye-opening for some people and show that drug addicts are not always weak people.

JV: She had to be taken care of already when pregnant. She knew that she couldn’t stop taking heroin until birth because her baby would die, and she also knew that she will go to a drug rehab immediately after that. When you work with someone like that, or give them treatment, your clients often need some intensive moment to move forward, some trigger to realise that they have to change their life. It can come any time, in a tram, looking into someone else’s pram or meeting some benefactor on the bridge who will give them some money and say: you can do it.

ŠS: In the case of Mallory it was the director of the Karlovy Vary International Film Festival, Jiří Bartoška, who didn’t know until the premiere that was held at the festival that a film was being made about her, in which he actually also appeared.

MN: But not everyone who is in need meets a benefactor. All of them should be aware that there are street workers, who selflessly help although they themselves don’t have much money. Mallory too became a street worker and it is always an advantage to have someone with a personal experience with taking drugs and living on the street doing the job. For instance, Katka features scenes when a young street worker tries to convince the drugged protagonist that she is the “measure of everything”. The whole scene made the impression that she was lacking the personal experience and wasn’t able to imagine how a person who is completely out of it feels in such a situation and how she actually perceives the situation.

JV: People with a personal experience are very valuable in organizations where the fluctuation of street workers is quite high. A former addict can speak with the people in the streets using their language, and, unlike fresh school graduates, he or she can send them to hell and be tough with them. Quite recently, we had such a dynamic situation at Sananim where we employed a team of people around 24 years of age and fifty-year-old-guy who was cooking crystal meth for seventeen years.


Vicious circle

MN: In Prague, the number of cases of active resistance against low-threshold services is on the rise, resulting in the close-down of contact centres or their relocation to more remote areas, often not accessible to the clients. Locals organise themselves in associations thus making our work on this level even more difficult.

JV: This is now a great issue in Prague, the individual districts don’t want to take responsibility thus leaving the task to the city hall. As a result, a single contact centre will be opened for one half of Prague’s addicts which will logically displease the Prague citizens. In the aftermath, many activities are initiated, for example, a ban on smaller contact centres within two kilometres from schools and these unfortunately resonate also in the Parliament. In this sense, the politicians on the local level and sometimes even the government are afraid to lend their ears to professionals and they prefer to appeal to the current moods of the citizens. There are, indeed, efforts to analyse this problem, but the mayors are often afraid of backlash from the citizens and voters.

MN: On the municipal level, we can see some of these attempts because authorities on this level can afford it, unlike local mayors who are facing direct pressure and thwart our praiseworthy efforts. But it is fair to say that in the context of former communist countries and cities, our drug control policy is among the best. But on the other hand, I can see some light at the end of the tunnel. On the global level, we can see a rather strong tendency towards decriminalisation or legalisation of some psychoactive substances. There is some hope.

JV: This will never happen though. The legalisation would have to be supported by the official policy of the USA. It is not enough for only some individual countries to strive for improvements.


more articles from a section:  Situational review

2.20The creators of Havel didn’t know that they don’t know. And that’s the worst kind of not knowing!Is director Slávek Horák’s film Havel truly chaos that says nothing at all about the recent history of our Czech nation or its first president? Or are the filmmakers entitled to artistic license and allowed to create whatever they like, despite giving the film and its main character the name Havel? And what does it say about the times we live in that from the legacy of the influential playwright, intellectual, politician, and master of words, the filmmakers chose to focus solely on his slightly sensationalised private life?Kamila Boháčková
1.20Will our civilisation negotiate this turn?American documentarian Jeff Gibbs’ activist film Planet of the Humans, which criticises the way we treat renewable energy sources, has evoked numerous controversial reactions. It’s no surprise that the producer is well-known filmmaker Michael Moore, who released the film freely on YouTube on Earth Day, when the worldwide corona virus pandemic was at its peak.Kamila Boháčková
1.20Caught in the Net should really be on the net if it’s going to change anythingDiscussion about the new film by Vít Klusák a Barbora Chalupová Caught in the NetKamila Boháčková
3.16From Disillusionment to KiskaA discussion on movie Difficult Choice by Zuzana PiussiJitka Lanšperková
2.16Wasted Potential of the Good Old TrabiA film critic, a social scientist and a traveler discuss the latest of the series of films by Dan Přibáň called With Trabants to the Last BreathJitka Lanšperková
1.16Living in a Moral VoidA discussion on new documentary Doomed Beauty by Helena Třeštíková and Jakub HejnaJitka Lanšperková
6.15Multi-layered Personal TestimonyA debate about the film Czechs Against Czechs by Czech documentarian Tomáš KratochvílJitka Lanšperková
4.15Tears for Steve JobsThe 19th Jihlava IDFF will show a premiere of a documentary film by the academy award-winning director Alex Gibney, Steve Jobs: Man in the Machine, about the emotional bond that can form between a man and a technical device.Jitka Lanšperková
2.15Addicted to Living TogetherDiscussion about movie Always Together directed by Eva TomanováJitka Lanšperková
1.15(Un)usual Energy of the Tribes?In this section, usually people from all kinds of different disciplines assess a specific documentary piece in joint discussion. However, for this issue we decided on a small change.Tomáš Stejskal

starší články

September 14, 2015

from current issue:

New releaseShooting About KunderaDocumentarian Miloslav Šmídmajer describes the process of making a documentary about Milan Kundera with the working title “Milan Kundera: From the Joke to Insignificance.” Miloslav ŠmídmajerThemeNest in the bedroomPeter Hames, well-known British film historian and author of the book The Czechoslovak New Wave sent his remembrance to Karel Vachek to our magazine.Peter HamesThemeNever stop laughingPaolo Benzi, the Italian film producer and founder of the independent film production company Okta Film, describes for dok.revue how he met famous Czech documentary filmmaker Karel Vachek, who passed away last year. Paolo Benzi is also the main tutor of the Emerging producers in Ji.hlava IDFF.Paolo BenziThemeBehold, if the river is turbulent he is not frightenedIn this English issue of dok.revue we have collected some remembrances to Karel Vachek, the respected Czech documentarist who died in December 2020 at the age of 80. One of the contributors is Olaf Möller, a well-known film theorist and critic collaborating with many renowned film magazines (Film Comment or Sight & Sound), film museums and festivals (e.g. Il Cinema Ritrovato or International Film Festival Rotterdam).Olaf MöllerThemeEvery human being should get to wear comfy shoesThe Czech documentarist Karel Vachek was a chairperson of the jury at Yamagata international documentary film festival (YIDFF) in 2009. The board member of YIDFF and the former director of this festival, Asako Fujioka, has a remembrance of him smoking his pipe and going to the mountains with Japanese poet and filmmaker Yoshimasu Gozo to recite poetry to the skies.Asako FujiokaThemeLike the dog on the beach...American film historian Alice Lovejoy writes her remembrance of Karel Vachek, the remarkable Czech documentarist to whom we dedicate this English issue of dok.revue.Alice LovejoyInterviewThe times of lifelong careers are overAn interview with documentarian Jindřich Andrš, whose film A New Shift won the Czech competition section Czech Joy at Ji.hlava IDFF2020.Vojtěch KočárníkInterviewGoing to the Polish Turf with Our Own TeamInterview with documentary filmmakers Filip Remunda and Vít Klusák about their latest joint film project Once Upon a Time in Poland that shows how religion and faith are misused in contemporary Poland for mass manipulation and political purposes. The film‘s Czech premiere was held as part of the Ji.hlava International Documentary Film Festival 2020.Kamila BoháčkováIntroductionDok.revue 1.21This issue is dedicated to the doyen of Czech documentary filmmaking Karel VachekKamila Boháčková